Applicability of nickel-based compounds as catalysts for thermal conversion of primary biomass pyrolysis products
https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-8358-2023-68-3-220-233
Abstract
The paper discusses the results of an experimental study of the thermal decomposition of pyrolytic tar carried out in isothermal conditions at temperatures of 300, 350 and 400 °C. It was found that the kinetics of this process can be described using the Avrami–Erofeev equation with a variable parameter n. Analysis of the established data showed that the area of variation of this index included values from 0.415 to 1.238. The mean value of the n parameter calculated for all variants of the study was 0.694 (95 % CI from 0.605 to 0.783), and the median value was 0.639. As is known, the Avrami–Erofeev equation describes the kinetics of thermal decomposition of matter in the condensed state, determined by the nucleation process. This suggests that in the case of thermal decomposition of pyrolytic tar in the temperature range 300–400 °С this process is the limiting stage of the total process. The pyrolytic tarn decomposition rate was found to increase in the case of introduction of particles of nickel catalyst developed at the Physical and Technical Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus into the reaction zone. However, only with respect to one sample, it can be confidently stated that this is the result of the catalytic effect of applied nickel catalyst. Based on the established data, it was concluded that it is promising to use a nickel-containing catalyst in the processes of thermal decomposition of heavy hydrocarbons formed in the processes of thermochemical conversion of biomass.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. MalkoBelarus
Mikhail V. Malko, Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Leading Researcher
15, building 2, Academicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk
S. V. Vasilevich
Belarus
Siarhei V. Vasilevich, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Laboratory
77, Uborevich Str., 220072, Minsk
K. B. Podbolotov
Belarus
Kirill B. Podbolotov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Structural Analysis Sector
10, Akademician Kuprevich Str., 220084, Minsk
D. V. Degterov
Belarus
Dmitry V. Degterov, Senior Researcher
15, building 2, Academicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk
A. N. Asadchyi
Belarus
Andrei N. Asadchyi, Senior Researcher
15, building 2, Academicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk
References
1. Fortov V. E., Popel’ O. S. The Current Status of the Development of Renewable Energy Sources Worldwide and in Russia. Thermal Engineering, 2014, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601514060020
2. De S., Agarwal A. K., Moholkar V. S., Bhaskar T. (eds.). Coal and Biomass Gasification. Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Springer Nature, Singapore Pte Ltd., 2018. 521 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7335-9.
3. Afanas’eva O. V., Mingaleeva G. R. Exergy efficiency of small coal-fired power plants as a criterion of their wide applicability. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2009, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 55–59. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0361521909010121
4. Dobrego K. V. Dolomite Thermal-Decomposition Macrokinetic Models for Evaluation of the Gasgenerators Sorbent Systems. Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 2015, no. 5, pp. 51–59 (in Russian).
5. Guoqing Guan, Xiaogang Hao, Abuliti Abudula. Heterogeneous Catalysts from Natural Sources for Tar Removal: A Mini Review. Journal of Advanced Catalysis Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–28. http://doi.org/10.15379/2408-9834.2014.01.01.4
6. Sutton D., Kelleher B., Ross J. R. H. Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00208-9
7. Baker E. G., Brown M. D., Elliott D. C., Mudge L. K. Characterization and Treatment of Tars from Biomass Gasifiers. AIChE 1988: Summer National Meeting, Denver, Colorado. August 21–24, 1988. Denver, 1988, pp. 1–11.
8. Sutton D., Kelleher B., Ross J. R. H. Review of Literature on Catalysts for Biomass Gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 155–173. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00208-9
9. Dayton D. A Review of the Literature on Catalytic Biomass Tar Destruction. Milestone Completion Report. NREL/ TP-510-32815. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2002. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy03osti/32815.pdf (accessed 20 July 2022).
10. El-Rub Z. A., Bramer E. A., Brem G. Review of Catalysts for Tar Elimination in Biomass Gasification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, vol. 43, no. 22, pp. 6911–6919. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0498403
11. Buyanov R. A. (ed.). Institute of Catalysis G.K. Boreskov of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Chronicle, 1958–2000. Novosibirsk, Publishing House of the Sibirian Branch of RAS, 2005. 353 p. (in Russian).
12. Azner, M. P., Caballero M. F., Gil J., Martin J. A. Commercial Steam Reforming Catalysts To Improve Biomass Gasification with Steam−Oxygen Mixtures. 2. Catalytic Tar Removal. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 2668–2680. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9706727
13. Milne T. A., Abatzoglou N., Evans R. J. Biomass Gasifier “Tars”: Their Nature, Formation and Conversion. NREL/ TP-570-25357. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1998. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/25357.pdf (accessed 20 July 2022).
14. Haibo Liu, Tianhu Chen, Donguin Change, Chen Dong, He Hongping, Frost R. Catalytic Cracking of Tars Derived from Rice Hull Gasification over Goethite and Palygorskite. Applied Clay Science, 2012, vol. 70, pp. 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.006
15. Kissinger H. E. Reaction Kinetics in Differential Thermal Analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 1957, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1702–1706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60131a045
16. Akahira T., Sunose T. Transactions of Joint Convention of Four Electrical Institutes. Paper No. 246, 1969 Research Report Chiba Institute of Technology. Science Technology, 1971, vol. 16, pp. 22–31.
17. Friedman H. Kinetics of Thermal Degradation of Char-Forming Plastics From Thermogravimetry. Application to Phe- nolic Plastic. Journal of Polymer Science. Part C: Polymer Symposia, 1964, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 183–195. http://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070060121
18. Flynn J. H., Wall L. A. A Quick, Direct Method for the Determination of Activation Energy from Thermogravimetric Data. Polymer Letters, 1966, vol. 4, pp. 323–328. http://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1966.110040504
19. Ozava T. A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1965, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 186–189. http://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.38.1881
20. Coats A. W., Redfern J. P. Kinetics Parameters from Thermogravimetric Data. Nature, 1964, vol. 201, pp. 68–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/201068a0
21. Criado J. V. Kinetic ansalysis of DTA data from master curves. Thermochimica Acta, 1978, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(78)85151-x
22. Vyazovkin S., Wight C. A. Model-free and model-fitting approaches to kinetic analysis of isothermal and nonisothermal data. Thermochimica Acta, 1999, vol. 340–341, pp. 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031%2899%2900253-1
23. Han Yunging. Theoretical Study of Thermal Analysis Kinetics: Thesis and Dissertations – Mechanical Engine- ering. Lexington, University of Kentucky, 2014. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=me_etds (accessed 20 July 2022).