Анализ существующих методов и аддитивных технологий 3D-печати полимерно-керамическими материалами
https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-8358-2026-71-1-7-17
Анатацыя
Проведен всесторонний анализ аддитивных технологий 3D-печати полимерно-керамическими ком позитами (ПКК). Особое внимание уделено преимуществам данных материалов, ограничениям и перспективам их использования в медицине, авиационно-космической отрасли и электронике. Систематизированы методы аддитивного производства, применимые для ПКК, включая технологии моделирования методом послойного наплавления (FDM), стереолитографии (SLA) и литографического формирования керамики (LCM). Представлен детальный обзор коммерческих и экспериментальных композиций, показаны оптимальные диапазоны содержания наполнителя, параметры печати и режимы постобработки. Сравнительные данные демонстрируют, что введение керамических добавок повышает механическую прочность, термостойкость и функциональные характеристики, но сопровождается технологическими сложностями – ростом вязкости материала, абразивным износом сопел и усадкой при спекании. Анализ текущих промышленных внедрений подтверждает растущий потенциал ПКК для биомедицины, энергетики и высокотехнологичных отраслей. Полимерно-керамические композиты, полученные методами аддитивного производства, обеспечивают уникальное сочетание технологичности полимеров и эксплуатационных свойств керамики. Несмотря на технологические трудности, достижения в области разработки составов материалов, проектирования оборудования и цифровой интеграции стремительно расширяют сферу применения ПКК. Дальнейшая оптимизация составов, параметров печати и гибридных методов производства ускорит переход полимерно-керамической 3D-печати от лабораторных исследований к широкомасштабному промышленному использованию.
Аб аўтарах
А. ИльющенкоРасія
А. Лецко
Расія
О. Кузнечик
Расія
Н. Парницкий
Расія
Ю. Реутёнок
Расія
Т. Николайчук
Расія
Спіс літаратуры
1. Pereira T., Kennedy J. V., Potgieter J. A. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 30, pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003
2. Attaran M. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Business Horizons, 2017, vol. 60, iss. 5, pp. 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011
3. Bhatia A., Sehgal A. K. Additive manufacturing materials, methods and applications: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, vol. 81, part 2, pp. 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.379
4. Gao W., Zhang Y., Ramanujan D., Ramani K., Chen Y., Williams C. B., Wang C. C. L. [et al.]. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer‑Aided Design, 2015, vol. 69, pp. 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001
5. Kanishka K., Acherjee B. Revolutionising manufacturing: A comprehensive overview of additive manufacturing processes, materials, developments, and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2023, vol. 107, pp. 574–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.10.024
6. Fu H., Xu H., Liu Y., Yang Z., Kormakov S., Wu D., Sun J. Overview of injection moulding technology for processing polymers and their composites. ES Materials & Manufacturing, 2020, vol. 8, pp. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.30919/esmm5f713
7. John L. K., Ramu M., Singamneni S., Binudas N. Strength evaluation of polymer ceramic composites: a comparative study between injection molding and fused filament fabrication techniques. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2025, vol. 10, pp. 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00626-9
8. Alizadeh-Osgouei M., Li Y., Wen C. A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials, 2019, vol. 4, pp. 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.11.003
9. Petousis M., Vidakis N., Mountakis N., Papadakis V., Tzounis L. Three-dimensional printed PA12 and PLA alumina (Al2O3) nanocomposites with significantly enhanced tensile, flexural and impact properties. Nanomaterials, 2022, vol. 12, iss. 23, art. ID 4292. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234292
10. Kumar R., Singh R., Hashmi M. S. J. Polymer-ceramic composites: a state of art review and future applications. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 2020, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1835013
11. Travitzky N., Bonet A., Dermeik B., Fey T., Filbert-Demut I., Schlier L., Schlordt T., Greil P. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2014, vol. 16, iss. 6, pp. 729–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400097
12. Feilden E., Ferraro C., Zhang Q., Tuñón E. G. 3D printing bioinspired ceramic composite. Scientific Reports, 2017, vol. 7, art. ID 13759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14236-9
13. Vaiani L., Boccaccio A., Uva A. E., Palumbo G., Piccininni A., Guglielmi P., Cantore S. [et al.]. Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: an overview on properties and fabrication processes. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2023, vol. 14, iss. 3, art. ID 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14030146
14. Gopsill J. A., Shindler J., Hicks B. J. Using finite element analysis to influence the infill design of fused deposition modelled parts. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0034-y
15. Colella R., Chietera F. P., Montagna F., Greco A., Catarinucci L. Customising 3D printing for electromagnetics to design enhanced RFID antennas. IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification, 2020, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRFID.2020.3001043
16. Li W. D., Wang C., Yin H. Y., Deng J. B., Mu H. B., Zhang G. J., Chen Y., Song F. L., Chen Y. L. Additive manufacturing of polymer-matrix composite dielectric materials using stereolithography technique. 2021 International Conference on Electrical Materials and Power Equipment (ICEMPE). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMPE51623.2021.9509221
17. Smirnov A., Seleznev A., Peretyagin P., Bentseva E., Pristinskiy Y., Kuznetsova E., Grigoriev S. Rheological characterization and printability of polylactide (PLA)–alumina (Al2O3) filaments for fused deposition modelling (FDM). Materials, 2022, vol. 15, iss. 23, art. ID 8399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238399
18. Liu W., Wu N., Pochiraju K. Shape recovery characteristics of SiC/C/PLA composite filaments and 3D printed parts. Composites. Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 108, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.017
19. Fournier S., Chevalier J., Reveron H., Chèvremont W., Baeza G. P. Rheology and structure of ceramic stereolithography slurries: role of powder nature, dispersant and orthogonal strain. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2024, vol. 108, iss. 4, art. ID e20304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.20304
20. Fu S.-Y., Feng X.-Q., Lauke B., Mai Y.-W. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites. Composites. Part B: Engineering, 2008, vol. 39, iss. 6, pp. 933–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002
21. Danilova S. N., Yarusova S. B., Lazareva N. N., Buravlev I. Y., Shichalin O. O., Papynov E. K., Zhevtun I. G. [et al.]. A study of the wear mechanism of composites modified with silicate filler. Ceramics, 2022, vol. 5, iss. 4, pp. 731–747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics5040053
22. Mahmood A., Perveen F., Chen S., Akram T., Irfan A. Polymer composites in 3D/4D printing: materials, advances and prospects. Molecules, 2024, vol. 29, iss. 2, art. ID 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020319
23. Gibson J., Rosen D., Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. New York, Springer New York, 2015. 498 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3
24. Zhao D., Bi G., Chen J., Quach W., Feng R., Salminen A., Niu F. A critical review of direct laser additive manufacturing ceramics. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2024, vol. 31, pp. 2607–2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2960-2
25. Fiume E., Coppola B., Montanaro L., Palmero P. Vat-photopolymerization of ceramic materials: exploring current applications in advanced multidisciplinary fields. Frontiers in Materials, 2023, vol. 10, art. ID 1242480. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1242480
26. Bertsch A., Zissi S., Jezequel J., Corbel S. Microstereophotolithography using a liquid crystal display as dynamic mask generator. Microsystem Technologies, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005420050053
27. Vaezi M., Seitz H., Yang S. A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, vol. 67, pp. 1721–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2
28. Zocca A., Colombo P., Gomes C.M., Günster J. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities and opportunities. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2015, vol. 98, iss. 7, pp. 1983–2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13700
29. Schwentenwein M., Homa J. Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2015, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12319
30. Sotov A. V., Zaytsev A. I., Abdrahmanova A. E., Popovich A. A. Additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced polymer composites using industrial robots: A review. Izvestiya vuzov. Poroshkovaya metallurgiya i funkcional’nye pokrytiya = Powder Metallurgy and Functional Coatings, 2024, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 20–30 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2024-1-20-30
31. Helou M., Kara S. Design, analysis and manufacturing of lattice structures: an overview. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2017.1407456
32. Czepiel M., Bańkosz M., Sobczak-Kupiec A. Advanced injection moulding methods. Materials, 2023, vol. 16, iss. 17, art. ID 5802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175802
33. Chaudhary R. P., Parameswaran C., Idrees M., Rasaki A. S., Liu C., Colombo P. Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics: materials, technologies, properties and potential applications. Progress in Materials Science, 2022, vol. 128, art. ID 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100969
34. Smirnov A., Terekhina S., Tarasova T., Hattali L., Grigoriev S. From the development of low-cost filament to 3D printing ceramic parts obtained by fused filament fabrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, vol. 128, pp. 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11849-5
35. Ratnavel R., Viswanath S., Subramanian J., Selvaraj V. K., Prahasam V., Siddharth S. Predicting the optimal input parameters for the desired print quality using machine learning. Micromachines, 2022, vol. 13, iss. 12, art. ID 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122231
36. Weng Z., Wang J., Senthil T., Wu L. Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modelling 3D printing. Materials & Design, 2016, vol. 102, pp. 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045
37. Lalegani Dezaki M., Mohd Ariffin M. K. A., Hatami S. An overview of fused deposition modelling (FDM): research, development and process optimisation. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2021, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0230.
38. Kantaros A., Soulis E., Petrescu F. I. T., Ganetsos T. Advanced composite materials utilised in FDM/FFF 3D-printing manufacturing processes: the case of filled filaments. Materials, 2023, vol. 16, iss. 18, art. ID 6210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186210
39. Wickramasinghe S., Do T., Tran P. FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: a review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 7, art. ID 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071529
40. Li C., Feng C., Zhang L., Wang L. Direct ink writing of polymer‑based materials – A review. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2024, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.27038
41. Sun C., Fang N. X., Wu D. M., Zhang X. Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2005, vol. 121, iss. 1, pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011
42. Skorda S., Bardakas A., Segkos A., Chouchoumi N., Hourdakis E., Vekinis G., Tsamis C. Influence of SiC doping on the mechanical, electrical, and optical properties of 3D-printed PLA. Journal of Composites Science, 2024, vol. 8, iss. 3, art. ID 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8030079
43. Valerga A.P., Batista M., Salguero J., Girot F. Influence of PLA filament conditions on characteristics of FDM parts. Materials, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 8, art. ID 1322. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081322
44. Samykano M., Selvamani S. K., Kadirgama K., Ngui W. K., Kanagaraj G., Sudhakar K. Mechanical property of FDM-printed ABS: influence of printing parameters. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, vol. 102, pp. 2779–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0
45. Rodríguez-Panes A., Claver J., Camacho A. M. The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behavior of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: A comparative analysis. Materials, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 8, art. ID 1333. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081333
46. Hwang S., Reyes E. I., Moon K.-S., Rumpf R. C., Kim N. S. Thermo-mechanical Characterization of Metal/Polymer Composite Filaments and Printing Parameter Study for Fused Deposition Modeling in the 3D Printing Process. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2014, vol. 44, pp. 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3425-6
47. Yu G., Ma J., Li J., Wu J. Yu J., Wang X. Mechanical and Tribological Properties of 3D Printed Polyamide 12 and SiC/PA12 Composite by Selective Laser Sintering. Polymers, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 11, art. ID 2167. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112167
48. Seenath A. A., Baig M. M. A., Katiyar J. K., Mohammed A. S. A Comprehensive Review on the Tribological Evaluation of Polyether-Ether-Ketone Pristine and Composite Coatings. Polymers, 2024, vol. 16, iss. 21, art. ID 2994. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16212994
49. Rodzeń A., Sharma P. K., McIlhagger A., Mokhtari M., Dave F., Tormey D., Sherlock R. [et al.]. The Direct 3D Printing of Functional PEEK/Hydroxyapatite Composites via a fused filament fabrication approach. Polymers, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 4, art. ID 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040545
50. Hidalgo-Carvajal D., Muñoz A. H., Garrido-González J. J., Carrasco-Gallego R. Recycled PLA for 3D printing: a comparison of recycled PLA filaments from waste of different origins after repeated cycles of extrusion. Polymers, 2023, vol. 15, iss. 17, art. ID 3651. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173651
51. Pelanconi M., Colombo P., Ortona A. Additive manufacturing of silicon carbide by selective laser sintering of PA12 powders and polymer infiltration and pyrolysis. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2021, vol. 41, iss. 10, pp. 5056–5065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.04.014
##reviewer.review.form##
JATS XML































